Saturday, June 30, 2012

The health care controversy is back.   I may not be smart enough to understand why it is such a complicated issue.   To me it is simple.  It should transcend politics, it should transcend religion and it should transcend profit.   We are living in the twenty-first century in the richest and most powerful country in the world and the fact that this is still a debate it almost mind boggling.  I'm simple soul.  You get sick you should be entitled to see a doctor and not worry about it.  Some thoughts:

  • The current bill is not perfect by any stretch.   In many ways I wish it would be repealed if it was guaranteed to be written again in a better format.  There are issues that I am against, mainly because of lobbying by insurance companies and pharmaceutical  companies caused concessions and clauses in their favour.   I think it's about time our politicians should be held accountable for what they do for the people not for what they get in incentives and donations.   Let elections be played on a level playing field and not on dollars.  Let decisions be made on what is right, not, on dollars.
  • There have been many arguments that are just short sighted and in my opinion fear mongering.   It's a tax increase.  True approximately a 3.8% increase on investments on people earning over $250,000.   That is on not a salary, but, on additional income only. For the vast majority of people health care is going to be cheaper.   I disagree with having to buy it, that's your choice, but, if you go to the urgent care or emergency room you pay one hundred percent and not let the rest foot the bill.   An overlooked situation in this.   We all currently play for the un-insured anyway so this will reduce everyone's burdens.  Let's face facts Mitt Romney only paid 14% tax last year where the majority of middle class Americans paid a much higher percentage.   It's not sharing the wealth, or socialism, it's fairness.
  • One of the main problems is the insurance companies.   We hear all the time that we don't want the Government making decisions on our health, well, what do the insurance companies do now?  There are countless stories where people who needed care where rejected, or, they got conditions they were rejected or they have a pre-existing condition, yes they were rejected.   I personally think every decision should be down to a doctor and they should be ethical, but, if someone else has to make a decision I'd rather it be someone without a financial stake than a company who's total goal is to make as big a profit as possible.  I have heard many people use the argument  comparing health insurance to life insurance our auto-insurance.   The argument is that it is not a right to drive, but, a privilege therefore it is ok to have mandatory insurance.  My argument is simply this, driving is optional getting sick is not.  I think even talking about the two in same breath is very trite.  One of the reasons for making car insurance mandatory is that serious damage can be caused to someone else.   The same argument could be made for someone who is seriously sick and not going to the doctor infecting others.  Again, the problem is it is insurance NOT health care.   In many ways a complete oxymoron.
  • This is not a "socialist" country, but, a capitalist country.   True.  A capitalist country is one where free private enterprise is allowed to make a profit.   I have no problems with that.   The problem is the fine line between greed and profit.  A hard definition to make.  In my opinion a definition of greed is where someone makes a good profit on the back off a workforce and then decides they need more profit so cut salaries or lay people off.  In the current political debate we so often hear that America does not want to become socialist like Europe.  Well talk about fear mongering or lies.  Europe, especially Western Europe is capitalist i.e. private individuals making profit and free market.  Where Europe differs from the US is it is more of a "Social Market Economy" what this means is that enterprise is free, but, there is Government social support such as unemployment, social security, health care etc..  A good way to say it is capitalism with the Government providing a safety net for it's Citizens.  In the States we are "Government FOR the People BY the People".   Isn't this therefore the governments responsibility?    Socialism is Government control of everything.   The ignorance and fear mongering is staggering.   I guess the US is socialist when it comes to Military, highway, law enforcement, FDA, USEPA etc..etc..  And of, course, the great National institution the NFL, pure socialism in revenue sharing!!
  • One final point that real irritates me, and if I talked about this many times, is the hypocrisy of the Fundamentalist, Right-wing evangelical Christian right.   They are some of the loudest in proclaiming that the Government should not be involved in people lives.  However, they want laws on abortion, marriage, more military spending etc.. etc..   All Jesus cared up about was the poor, the sick, the needy.  Surely as Christians with influence we should be involved in all issues to solve these problems, be it through Government or private charity?  

So, these are a few points.  What about a solution.  I have two ideas. (a)  Either make the insurance companies non-profit so that this will reduce the health costs as well as not having money influence decisions and also allow everyone to have coverage they can afford, not discriminated against because you were unfortunate enough to be born with a health condition or develop one.  (b) Have a flat pay-roll tax that everyone pays no matter what they earn.   This will mean everyone will have an investment in their own health.   Yes, those earning more will be more, but, it will be straight fair flat tax on everyone.   This will mean the vast majority of Americans will be better off.   Another very positive affect will be to take the health care burden from industry.  We are constantly hearing how American labour is too expensive and it is being moved over seas.  Take providing health care from the companies, even make them pay 1% flat tax is going to ease their burden allowing more good paying jobs to be kept in America.   I do believe that everyone has the personal choice to opt out, but, they should take the whole financial burden for doing.   We don't have kids yet I don't have the choice to opt out of my taxes that go to Education, or, I oppose war yet I can't opt out of my taxes going to the ridiculously over the top military spending etc..etc...

I am no where near an expert on this, but, I am passionate about it because I have seen way too many good people get sick, loose their houses, going to work sick just because they couldn't afford the medical bills.  I a not talking about lazy people doing nothing, I am talking about good hard working people some doing multiple jobs.  We need to do something about it NOW!!!

I could go on and on, but, won't but as conclusion some of the lesser known things the current bill covers:
As a final thought some things that the current bill covers can be found here.  Some little things that I think most sane minded people generally agree with: http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/26/health/health-reform-fun-facts/index.html

-Richard 

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Still thinking about the North Carolina Amendment vote I am going to copy a couple of paragraphs from something I wrote back in 2008 followed by some more comments.

"The current interpretation of this amendment from The Supreme Court down is that religion, or religious argument has no place at all in Government, therefore a complete separation of Church and State to use the correct jargon. Using this argument the Gay Marriage issue immediately becomes a non-issue. Why? Marriage is a church, or religious sacrament coming through the Judeo-Christian (including Islam) tradition. Therefore, as such the government should have no right to legislate on marriage.Period. Of any description. That includes issuing marriage certificates, filling taxes as married anything to do with the definition of marriage. If the government wishes to legislate on what legally in the eyes of a law constitutes a legal partnership for rights as a couple or individual that is their prerogative as the democratically elected body of the people. This also means that the government has no right to interfere in a religious bodies interpretation of what is right or wrong within a church, synagogue or mosque. Therefore, if a church says homosexuality is wrong so be it. If a church says smoking crack is a religious freedom so be it. This obviously opens a can of worms to where the line is drawn. Back to my original point. Under this argument I do not have an issue with a Gay Civil Union because, whatever my beliefs based on the Bible, I also do not believe in discrimination of any description, however difficult that may seem and no-one has a right to judge anyone only to try and love. Any argument to the contrary is un-scriptural. 


My personnel opinion, ...................... leaving the option open to a government to interfere in a religious or church is open to abuse and could lead to discrimination. It is not our right as human beings to judge. That is for God, so let people make their own decision as to how they want to live their life (as long as it does not cause a threat to other living creatures). That's why I am one hundred percent against any form of discrimination. Having said that, as a Christian, I still believe what is right and wrong as taught by the Bible so I may think that something is wrong, but, will try with all my might to love the people and not discriminate. This also means that a Church should not be persecuted for following their doctrines."


To some up the Christianity of the Bible teaches love, not, hate.  Jesus spent time with the prostitute and the tax collector.  He spoke out against the Pharisees (the indignant morale right) and called them vipers.   If we are going to judge one lifestyle, or, sin what about the rest?  If you are, or, have been sexually "pure" in all aspects of thought and deed then have at it.   If not then do not judge those you do not know.   At the end, in my belief Jesus will come back and judge as only He can.   I hope He can look at me and say you sinned, you screwed up yet I died for You and forgave you, but,what you did do was love the poor, the sick, the sinners etc..etc.. and did not judge and tried to love them as I love everyone of them.    It is not a difficult concept.  Jesus' teaching, no matter who you believe He was , is clear and can be expressed in one short, overly used and totally misrepresented in the modern world:  LOVE.   The one word that He did not use: HATE.  As I wrote in my last post read Matthew 7:1-5.

The thing that also has been overlooked in the gay aspect of this amendment is it is against any common-law relationship.   Again, the State has no right to define marriage it's responsibility is to take care of its Citizens.   Wouldn't be wonderful if all this energy, money and passion actually went to good for all such as...shock, horror, ....making sure everyone could go to the doctors for example.   

I wish I was talented enough to express it so much better, but, this is why I am against the North Carolina amendment any other such law.  

-Richard


Since when does the Gospel of Christ teach hate, judgement and intolerance rather than love, compassion and forgiveness?

Matthew 7:1-5

- Richard


Saturday, May 5, 2012


My Love

Just looking into Your beauty,
Sitting in Your presence,
Enjoying Your peace and love
Is just no more than I desire.

I fail You so many times.
Yet! You keep on forgiving,
Keep giving me one last chance,
Covering me in Your love.

Words can’t express how I feel.
I just try to do my best
To worship, praise and adore You
In all that I do.

Lord Jesus thank you
I want to see more of Your love
To spend more time with Yoi,
I love You, oh, my God.


August 1989, Camp Tecumseh, NJ, USA




-Richard

Why Christmas?

The Son of God gas come,
The shouts from Heaven cried
A life ahead to tell
Of His Fathers love and Kingdom to come.

A little baby born of flesh,
Born so humble in a barn
As He grew into a man
He lived for the poor, the lonely and the hurt.

Through His life He suffered
As God’s works He carried out
In the ultimate sacrifice
He gave His life for the world.

Today, are we any better off?
Christmas and Easter we celebrate
The true reason forgotten
As hurting, loneliness and suffering still go on.


August, 1989, Camp Tecumseh, NJ, USA.




-Richard

Deserter

I can hear the hammer
Striking the nails again and again
Smashing the bone of his hands,
Tearing the flesh of his feet
The pain searing with each blow.
The blow which time and time you give.

Yes, those feet you once kissed.
You held those hands close
Accepting his love you took
That torn body from the cross,
Cleansed your life
And gave your all to the Christ.

The crunch came, a choice to be made
Between Him and the world
Romance came along and you fell
Sliding away from your Lord
Every step you made
Putting Him back on that cross.




May 1989, Bradford, England.




-Richard

Sunday, February 26, 2012


Dedicated to Satan

The Friday Jesus hung from the cross,
His dead body
Destined for the grave,
You and your devils celebrating
A victory you’d only dreamed of
You’d crushed God’s Son.
You’d defeated the Almighty God.

On the Sunday your party was crashed.
God’s power still reigned,
The grave was empty.
Jesus had conquered death,
He’s conquered Hell,
He’d conquered you.
He was still alive!!

Yet, even now you keep fighting
Attacking God’s children
Trying desperately to
Cause them to fail and turn to you.
Every trick, every ploy
You use, to no avail
As we move into victory.

Soon we will be rid of you,
Our Lord coming back
Finally condemning you to Hell
Ridding the earth of your evil.
Jesus will rule over the earth again.
Victory His,
You doomed for ever.



May 1989, Bradford, England.

-Richard